Thursday, January 30, 2020

My Favourite Communication Essay Example for Free

My Favourite Communication Essay Introduction to communication, I not only have more knowledge, and skills but also having real experiences. Nonverbal Communication and establishing relationship level meaning which are the most important things I had been learned. Nonverbal communication is crucial in relationships because it is essentially the leading factor for communication. There are three different ways that nonverbal communication is shown in relationships: responsiveness, liking, and power. Responsiveness is when we use our eye contact, posture, and body gestures to convey our emotions and thoughts to the other person. For instance, if someone were to slouch in their chair and have a bored look on their face, they are probably conveying that they dont care about the class or that they are not interested in anything that is being said. Liking is a way to show positive communication towards others. Examples of this would be smiles, hugs, kisses, high fives, etc. Learning about nonverbal communication and how it establishes relationship level meaning is crucial in my everyday life. Nonverbal communication is essential in any relationship so learning about responsiveness, liking, and power, will give me a better understanding on the quality and level of my relationships. For instance, when I am working with a group at university, I will be able to better understand and have better awareness of the people who want to work and those who do not. It not only helps to better understand nonverbal communication but also to be aware of it in every situation. In my future career, nonverbal communication will play a fundamental role. If I am to pursue a profession in sign language interpreting, I will have to be able to tune my senses to everything nonverbal. Sign language is all about facial expression and body language, so learning about postures and gestures in nonverbal communication will really give me a tool to be aware of the nonverbal behaviors.

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

My Personal Philosophy of Education :: Education Teachers Reflective Writing Essays

Philosophy of Education A classroom is a community for learning, friendship, and growth. The most important aspect of any community, educational or otherwise, is communication. When communicating with my students, I will not talk down to them; instead, I will treat them like the equal human beings that they are. Respect will be given to and earned from all students. I will be honest, humorous, and easy natured, but I will not be afraid to discipline or assert my authority as the situation may dictate. Students will feel comfortable providing feedback on my lessons and classroom policies; they will know that although I may not use all of their suggestions, I have given them due consideration. I will attempt to know each of the students on an individual basis, knowing more than just their names and performances in class. Even if I am led outside math, I will try to inspire each student to achieve his or her best and to follow his or her dreams. I realize that not everyone loves math as I do, and I will not hold that against my students as long as they put forth their best effort. Students will feel welcome and safe in the classroom. They will not be afraid of giving a wrong answer and will take risks to answer questions and participate in class. I will encourage my students to visit me outside of class for anything, whether it is to get class-related help, to ask advice on courses or careers, or to vent about a really bad day. In my classroom, I will teach mathematics at a level in which the students will be able to comprehend the material, but will also be challenged by it. Math should not frustrate, nor bore, nor monotonously repeat mundane problems. To remedy these common problems, I will share my love and enthusiasm of the discipline by creatively introducing new topics and explaining solutions to problems using more than one method, if available. Students will be able to explore multiple solutions and find the method of solution with which they feel most comfortable rather than having to conform to my preferred methods. The array of labs or trips that will be employed to explore mathematics will make class an exciting atmosphere. My Personal Philosophy of Education :: Education Teachers Reflective Writing Essays Philosophy of Education A classroom is a community for learning, friendship, and growth. The most important aspect of any community, educational or otherwise, is communication. When communicating with my students, I will not talk down to them; instead, I will treat them like the equal human beings that they are. Respect will be given to and earned from all students. I will be honest, humorous, and easy natured, but I will not be afraid to discipline or assert my authority as the situation may dictate. Students will feel comfortable providing feedback on my lessons and classroom policies; they will know that although I may not use all of their suggestions, I have given them due consideration. I will attempt to know each of the students on an individual basis, knowing more than just their names and performances in class. Even if I am led outside math, I will try to inspire each student to achieve his or her best and to follow his or her dreams. I realize that not everyone loves math as I do, and I will not hold that against my students as long as they put forth their best effort. Students will feel welcome and safe in the classroom. They will not be afraid of giving a wrong answer and will take risks to answer questions and participate in class. I will encourage my students to visit me outside of class for anything, whether it is to get class-related help, to ask advice on courses or careers, or to vent about a really bad day. In my classroom, I will teach mathematics at a level in which the students will be able to comprehend the material, but will also be challenged by it. Math should not frustrate, nor bore, nor monotonously repeat mundane problems. To remedy these common problems, I will share my love and enthusiasm of the discipline by creatively introducing new topics and explaining solutions to problems using more than one method, if available. Students will be able to explore multiple solutions and find the method of solution with which they feel most comfortable rather than having to conform to my preferred methods. The array of labs or trips that will be employed to explore mathematics will make class an exciting atmosphere.

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

NAFTA: Gainers and Losers

Economic cooperation has been a trend in neighboring countries to promote a free-trade zone for the benefit of its constituent countries. The largest of such, the North American Free Trade Agreement, was found in 1994 by the three North American countries. The members of NAFTA are the US, Canada and Mexico which includes a total of 416 million people and a GDP totaling to $12 trillion (Pohlmann, 2006). NAFTA aimed to totally remove trade barriers between the members for 15 years, which is scheduled to be in 2009. It also reduces the non-tariff trade barriers like sanitary regulations significantly. Although NAFTA major advantages, many are against it. Most of them are in the non-economic areas, and following are examples: US labor unions, environmentalists and Mexican farmers. They believe that NAFTA has unfavorable effects on them. Not all Mexicans are against it, in fact some of them had high hopes that the implementation of this contract would help boost their economy (Pohlmann, 2006). The NAFTA issue is debated in the Congress, with three major subjects: employment, environment and immigration from Mexico to the US. Tariffs had been an important factor in NAFTA for tariffs are taxes on imports and it usually makes imported products more expensive in order top benefit local products. NAFTA participants agreed to cut down the tariffs by 50% and they also agreed to reduce tariffs to 0 in the succeeding fifteen years. Economists clearly saw the benefits NAFTA could have with all its participants. They based their reasoning with the principle of comparative advantage wherein their country would be more organized in creating their goods. Thus each country would produce the goods wherein they are more efficient in producing and they would trade those goods with the goods of other country (which they are very good in producing in their own). However, there are those who contested the free trade contract believing that it would have certain effect on employment as well as on income. There are those who argue that there would be a great deal of unemployment because of rivalry in Mexico. They argued that since wages are much lower in Mexico as compared to United States, then businessmen would start moving their businesses in Mexico. However, there are those who argue that the reason behind higher wages in US lies on the fact that worker efficiency is greater in US as compared to Mexico. NAFTA proved to have great consequence in terms of employment in US. According to a study conducted by the US International Trade Commission (ITI), the US government could gain moderately from a free trade agreement with Mexico. A historical study also showed that NAFTA could produce about 134, 000 jobs in the US. However, a simple method of study conducted by Baldwin and Kahane showed the effects NAFTA could have in terms of employment. The particular study had been conducted in order to see which division would have employment gains and which would undergo job losses. A tabular data had been used in order to create two variables, that of â€Å"gainers† and that of â€Å"losers†. Among the gainers are electrical and non-electrical machinery alike as well as rubber chemicals. However, on the side of the losers we have textiles, glass, leather products and the like. It is important to distinguish gainers from losers and thus an explanation is provided in the quotation be low. The term GAINERS is associated to the number of employees in areas that were projected to have job gains, while the term LOSERS is related to job losses (Kahane, 1996). Thus, the effect of NAFTA allowed a rise in trade in both Canada and Mexico. There is also no clear evidence that US indeed lose jobs because of Mexico. And all in all it showed that there are industries which gained because of the NAFTA agreement while there are also those industries that had had their share of losses as had been mentioned in this paper. Reference: Kahane, L. (1996). Congressional voting patterns on NAFTA: an empirical analysis – North American Free Trade Agreement [Electronic Version]. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0254/is_n4_v55/ai_18910967. Pohlmann, D. (2006). The Economic Impact of NAFTA on Mexico [Electronic Version]. Scholarly Publishing House. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://www.grin.com/en/preview/67522.html. Rosson, P., Runge, F., & Moulton, K. S. Preferential Trading Arrangements: Gainers and Losers from Regional Trading Blocs [Electronic Version]. Retrieved June 4, 2007 from http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/agecon/trade/eight.html.      

Monday, January 6, 2020

The Causes of Japanese Aggression in WWII

In the 1930s and 1940s, Japan seemed intent on colonizing all of Asia.  It seized vast swathes of land and numerous islands; Korea was already under its control, but it added Manchuria, coastal China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Singapore, Thailand, New Guinea, Brunei, Taiwan, and Malaya (now Malaysia). Japanese attacks even reached to Australia in the south, the U.S. territory of Hawaii in the east, the Aleutian Islands of Alaska in the north, and as far west as British India in the Kohima campaign. What motivated a formerly reclusive island nation to go on such a rampage?   Three major interrelated factors contributed to Japans aggression during and in the lead-up to World War II. These factors were: Fear of outside aggressionGrowing Japanese nationalismNeed for natural resources Japans fear of outside aggression stemmed in large part from its experience with western imperial powers, beginning with the arrival of Commodore Matthew Perry and an American naval squadron in Tokyo Bay in 1853. Faced with overwhelming force and superior military technology, the Tokugawa shogun had no option but to capitulate and sign an unequal treaty with the U.S. The Japanese government was also painfully aware that China, hitherto the great power in East Asia, had just been humiliated by Britain in the first Opium War. The shogun and his advisers were desperate to escape a similar fate. After the Meiji Restoration To avoid being swallowed up by the imperial powers, Japan reformed its entire political system in the Meiji Restoration, modernized its armed forces and industry, and began to act like the European powers. As a group of scholars wrote in the 1937 government-commissioned pamphlet, Fundamentals of our National Policy: Our present mission is to build a new Japanese culture by adopting and sublimating Western cultures with our national polity as the basis  and to contribute spontaneously to the advancement of world culture.   These changes affected everything from fashion to international relations. Not only did Japanese people adopt western clothing and haircuts, but Japan demanded and received a slice of the Chinese pie when the former eastern superpower was divided into spheres of influence at the end of the nineteenth century. The Japanese Empires triumphs in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894 to 1895) and the Russo-Japanese War (1904 to 1905) marked its debut as a true world power. Like the other world powers of that era, Japan took both wars as opportunities to seize land. Just a few decades after the seismic shock of Commodore Perrys appearance in Tokyo Bay, Japan was on its way to building a true empire of its own. It epitomized the phrase the best defense is a good offense. A sometimes virulent nationalism began to develop in the public discourse as Japan achieved increased economic output, military success against larger powers like China and Russia, and a new importance on the world stage. A belief emerged among some intellectuals and many military leaders that the Japanese people were racially or ethnically superior to other peoples. Many nationalists emphasized that the Japanese were descended from Shinto gods  and that the Japanese emperors were direct descendants of Amaterasu, the Sun Goddess. As historian Kurakichi Shiratori, one of the imperial tutors, put it, Nothing in the world compares to the divine nature of the imperial house and likewise the majesty of our national polity. Here is one great reason for Japans superiority. With such a genealogy, of course, it was only natural that Japan should rule the rest of Asia. The Rise of Nationalism This ultra-nationalism arose in Japan at the same time that similar movements were taking hold in the recently unified European nations of Italy and Germany, where they would develop into Fascism and Nazism. Each of these three countries felt threatened by the established imperial powers of Europe, and each responded with assertions of its own peoples inherent superiority. When World War II broke out, Japan, Germany, and Italy would ally themselves as the Axis Powers. Each would also act ruthlessly against what it considered to be lesser peoples. That is not to say that all Japanese were ultra-nationalist or racist, by any means. However, many politicians, and especially army officers, were ultra-nationalist. They often couched their intentions toward other Asian countries in Confucianist language, stating that Japan had a duty to rule the rest of Asia, as an elder brother should rule over younger brothers. They promised to end European colonialism in Asia or to liberate East Asia from white invasion and oppression, as John Dower phrased it in War Without Mercy.  In the event, the Japanese occupation and the crushing expense of World War II did hasten the end of European colonialism in Asia; however, Japanese rule would prove anything but brotherly. Speaking of war expenses, once Japan staged the Marco Polo Bridge Incident and started its full-scale invasion of China, it began to run short of many vital war materials including oil, rubber, iron, and even sisal for rope-making. As the Second Sino-Japanese War dragged on, Japan was able to conquer coastal China, but both the Nationalist and Communist armies of China put up an unexpectedly effective defense of the vast interior. To make matters worse, Japans aggression against China prompted western countries to embargo key supplies  and the Japanese archipelago is not rich in mineral resources.   Annexation In order to sustain its war effort in China, Japan needed to annex territories that produced oil, iron for steelmaking, rubber, etc. The nearest producers of all of those goods were in Southeast Asia, which—conveniently enough—was colonized at the time by the British, French, and Dutch. Once World War II in Europe erupted in 1940 and Japan allied itself with the Germans, it had justification for seizing enemy colonies. In order to ensure that the U.S. would not interfere with Japans lightning-fast Southern Expansion—in which it simultaneously struck the Philippines, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaya—Japan decided to wipe out the U.S. Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. It attacked each of the targets on Dec. 7, 1941 on the American side of the International Date Line, which was Dec. 8 in East Asia. The Imperial Japanese armed forces seized oil fields in Indonesia and Malaya. Those countries, along with Burma, supplied iron ore, and with Thailand supplied rubber. In other conquered territories, the Japanese requisitioned rice and other food supplies, sometimes stripping local farmers of every last grain.   However, this vast expansion left Japan overextended. Military leaders also underestimated how quickly and fiercely the United States would react to the Pearl Harbor attack. In the end, Japans fear of outside aggressors, malignant nationalism, and demand for natural resources to support resulting wars of conquest led to its Aug. 1945 downfall.

Sunday, December 29, 2019

My Family s Heritage By Lev Vygotsky - 1796 Words

Who Am I In order to truly understand the culture and various lifestyles that envelop American society today, one must learn to appreciate and understand their own cultural heritage. Lev Vygotsky, a psychologist in the early 1900’s, simply put it, â€Å"Language and culture are the frameworks through which humans experience, communicate, and understand reality.† Therefore, culture determines more than merely our origin or family; culture shapes the structure of our lives, and greatly impacts our future perspective of the world. As I began to explore my family’s history and lineage, I developed a sense of pride as I was exposed to the endeavors my great-grandparent’s underwent. Whether it was struggling to enter a completely different culture,†¦show more content†¦The predominately African American Detroit forced Jason and Kathleen to dive into a different culture, including the NFL culture. While Kathleen became involved in the Detroit Lions Wive’s group, Jason was forced to assimilate into the â€Å"locker room† culture. As a result of their observation of NFL player’s shallow lifestyles, the newly-wed couple was encouraged to be responsible with their money. Kathleen reminds others, â€Å"One of the things that was very evident in the NFL, is that money and success do not make you ultimately happy.† As the NFL enveloped their lives, they continued to evade the materialistic lifestyle. Jason continued to play for twenty one years until he retired in 2012. While Kathleen spent time volunteering at CareNet Pregnancy Center and gaining her biblical counseling certification, Jason began to speak at organizations and arrange private kicking lessons. While this couple shaped who I am, two alternative couples shaped who they were; my grandparents. Beginning with my mother’s side, my grandma, Sharon McCloskey, was born in Stanford, Montana in 1939. Her parents and sister dwelled in Texas and California, l iving half the year in each state in order to satisfy each parent’s wishes. As Sharon matured, she soon discovered her passion laid in music; thus, Sharon attended Westmont College in California in the fall of 1957 in part to a vocal scholarship.Show MoreRelatedBronfenbrenner s Ecological Systems Theory Essay1964 Words   |  8 PagesUrie Bronfenbrenner as with many other contextual perspective theorists’ views families as structures of relating individuals. This can be explained by how both the parents and children play a part in influencing the other. Bronfenbrenner takes the proposed general theories a step further by adding two very important factors. These two factors are genes (Bio) and the environment (Ecology) in which the child develops in. The two factors as mentioned previously are the foundation of Bronfenbrenner’sRead MoreReal Self How Others See Me Ideal Self3515 Words   |  15 Pagesgirls after a certain age and started losing friends around 16 . Well I realized my friends were around me because they liked my company. When I fell into a deep depression after coming to terms with the world, some didn t want to be around me anymore because it made them feel bad too. The best advice I had which I read online was pay attention to what people do instead of what they say. This dramatically improved my life. I noticed girls’ eyes lighting up when they mentioned topics and they wouldRead MoreFactors Affecting Motivation to Learn English25117 Words   |  101 Pagesthat although parents and close significant others do have influence on the respondents’ attitude and perception towards the English language, their English proficiency grades were not influenced by them. In conclusion, socializing factors such as family members and significant others are not significant contributors to English proficiency in Chinese students in Johor Bahru but they do contribute to the positive attitude and perception towards English that many of the respondents have. iii

Friday, December 20, 2019

How Far Did Us Presidents Hinder Rather Than Help the...

How far did US presidents hinder rather than help the development of African American civil rights in the period from 1865-1941? During the period 1865 to 1941, there were as many as 18 presidents in office and in one way or another, they would’ve had to deal with the ongoing issue of black civil rights, whether that be improving them or reversing them. 1865 was the year of the end of the civil war, which has been a war over the question of whether slavery should be allowed. The South was defending the right to keep slavery within their confederate states, and the north was opposed to any extension of slavery. This was a key point in the fight for African American civil rights. 1865 was also known for the introduction of the 13th†¦show more content†¦Wilson also appointed southern segregationists to separate employees. He did draft many black soldiers into the army, hundreds of thousands in fact, however he kept them segregated and put them in black regiments with white (usually strictly racist) officers. He was heavily criticised by both sides. African Americans believed his actions were discr iminatory and he was believed to take segregation too far, however others believed that he didn’t restrict black employment enough, especially within government. From looking at his actions, he didn’t impose much legislation which was specifically targeted at African Americans, however his enthusiastic support of segregation meant that it became an issue for blacks in both their everyday lives to the progression of their civil rights. Andrew Johnson, who was in office from 1865, shared similar views to Woodrow Wilson. They favoured the Southern Democratic elite, however took a different approach and attempted to pass more legislation. Johnson was in office at the point of when the civil war had ended, and the Southern states had been defeated, although refusing to admit defeat. Johnson was left with the question of what to do with these states, and unusually for a democrat, believed they needed to join the union. The motive behind these beliefs are unknown, however the likelihood is that he believed this due to the laws on slavery in unionShow MoreRelatedOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesand Paul Buhle, eds., The New Left Revisited David M. Scobey, Empire City: The Making and Meaning of the New York City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political Autobiography Allida M. Black, ed., Modern American Queer History Eric Sandweiss, St. Louis: The Evolution of an American Urban Landscape Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past Sharon Hartman Strom, Political Woman: Florence Luscomb and the Legacy of Radical Reform Read MoreProject Managment Case Studies214937 Words   |  860 PagesSTUDIES, SECOND EDITION HAROLD KERZNER, Ph.D. Division of Business Administration Baldwin-Wallace College Berea, Ohio John Wiley Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. @ Copyright O 2006 by John Wiley Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Lives of Saints Christinas Strength In Resisting Essay Example For Students

Lives of Saints: Christinas Strength In Resisting Essay Societys DemandsLives of Saints: Christinas Strength In Resisting Societys DemandsAs you grow older it is inevitable that you will change in many ways. As amatter of fact it is impossible to survive without the ability to adapt tosituations and surroundings. This ability is acquired as you age, learn andexperience life. It is a part of growing up and society demands that you adaptand conform to their mores and customs. It is always difficult to veer from thepath of uniformity which society leads. Many times you are able to slip byunnoticed with a minor variance from this path. However, when someone decides toblatantly blaze their own trail, often society makes their further growth anddevelopment a difficult task. As a result the community only toleratesacquiescence and conformity. Like the character Cristina in Nino Riccis novelLives of the Saints, it is only the most tenacious that can resist caving in tothe pressure. Often, this deviance can harm others, not just the dissident. Vittorio iscontinually badgered for the deeds his mother performed, and he is too innocentto realize that, her independence of spirit is the reason. As well, Cristinasfather does not see past the cloud which has slowly been built up in Valle delSole. The cloud which prevents most people from seeing how the failure to be anindividual rules the town, and how anyone with the nerve to be unique isostracized. Cristinas fathers failure to understand this leads to the declineand eventually their total destruction of the family structure. In many ways, the story of the character Cristina in the novel is similarto the story of Saint Christina. They both endure considerable suffering forstanding up for their beliefs. In both cases they have whole villages opposingthem, and neither of them give in, thus proving how strong they are. In the end,Santa Christina and Cristina end up leaving behind these villages for a betterexistence. The villagers continuous attention to whatever Cristina does, prevents herfrom living her life as she would like. Cristinas only choice is to keep toherself and go about the tedious and repetitive housework she does day in andday out. This prevents any advance in her development and growth, she is leftlike a skipping record playing the same thing over and over, not making anyprogress in her life. In Nino Riccis novel Lives of the Saints, Cristinas surprising strengthto resist societys demands is vital in showing how society can control people. In todays world one must realize this and learn to take it in stride. Everyonemust grow and change, it is a fact of life and a necessity as much as sex is. Society should not be the only influence to the way an individual thinks or acts,because who really decides what is acceptable or not in societys eyes?English